LexisNexis Practical Guidance®

Straightforward guidance across a range of topics

Overview

  • De facto relationships under the Family Law Act 1975

  • Marriage

  • Separation

Until 1 March 2009 de facto relationships in all States and Territories except Western Australia were governed by the relevant State or Territory legislation. That State and Territory legislation still applies to couples who do not meet the jurisdictional basis of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (FLA) but now is applied primarily in respect of a division of property on separation rather than children.

De facto relationships in all States and Territories except Western Australia that ceased to exist prior to 1 March 2009 (or 1 July 2010 in the case of South Australia) continue to be dealt with in the District Court or Supreme Court of each State and Territory under the legislation applicable in that jurisdiction:

See De facto law — state based.

De facto relationships under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)

In broad terms, a de facto couple in any State or Territory except for Western Australia may apply to the Family Court of Australia or Federal Circuit Court of Australia (or such other relevant state court having jurisdiction for family law matters) for their property matters to be dealt with under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) provided:

  • they are two adult persons of either gender;
  • who live together on a genuine domestic basis;
  • they are not family (that is, they are not related);
  • their relationship is of at least two years duration in total; and
  • at least one third of their relationship has been spent in a relevant referring jurisdiction.

Where a couple is in dispute over the living or care arrangements of a child of the de facto relationship, the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) applies irrespective of the length of the relationship.

Parties in referring states in a de facto relationships who separated after 1 March 2009 are now dealt with in the Family Court of Australia under the Family Law Act 1975. The referring states are NSW, Victoria, Queensland, Tasmania, South Australia and the ACT while Western Australia has retained its own legislation which applies to de facto couples. Married couples in Western Australia are dealt with under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). The Family Court Act 1997 (WA) mirrors the substantive provisions of the Family Law Act in any event.

There are a range of factors, not just a period of cohabitation, which must be considered to determine whether or not a couple comes within the legal definition of de facto. Once it is established that a de facto relationships exists for the purpose of either the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (or Family Court Act 1997 ( WA), consideration must then be given to the “gateway requirements”, as not all de facto relationships are caught by the provisions of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (or in WA the Family Court Act 1997). There must be a territorial connection to the relevant jurisdiction, or a recognised exception to the normal gateway requirements.

Note that a “de facto relationship” includes both heterosexual and same-sex relationships.

See De facto law under the Family Law Act.

Cohabitation

Before parties can be said to be in a de facto relationship for the purposes of the Family Law Act or for state-based legislation, they must be "cohabitating".

It is also important to note the separation date, as the provisions of the Family Law Act relating to de facto property and financial settlements relate to parties who separate on or after 1 March 2009. (or 1 July 2010 in the case of South Australia).

See Cohabitation.

De facto law — state based

In the event that the relationship does not satisfy the “gateway” or other requirements of the Family Law Act, then the law applicable to that relationship will be state or territory based.

For a consideration of the state and territory based laws relating to de facto relationships not covered by the Family Law Act, see De facto law — state based.

Definition of a marriage

The framework for the concept of marriage is provided by the Marriage Act 1961 (Cth) and reinforced by the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) which widens the role of the Court to deal with financial, property and parenting issues related to the breakdown of a marriage and which are known as “matrimonial causes”. Under the Marriage Act 1961 (Cth), references to “husband and wife” are altered to “husband, wife or spouse”.

Since 9 December 2017, marriage has been defined as “the union of 2 people to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life.”: s 5 of Marriage Act 1961 (Cth). This change enables people of the same sex to marry and was accompanied by significant exceptions and protections to authorised celebrants who are permitted to rely on their religious beliefs to refuse to solemnise same sex marriages.

In Australia at present the conditions for a marriage are:

  • the marriage must be voluntary;
  • the marriage must be for life, ie, the parties' intention at the time of the marriage;
  • the union must be between two people who are not in a prohibited relationship;
  • the union must be between two adults; and
  • neither party must be married to another person.
Constitutional framework

Pursuant to s 51(xxi) of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (Cth), the Commonwealth Government in Australia has power to make laws relating to marriage, and by implication, the breakdown of those marriages. Since 2009, following a referral of powers from participating States and Territories, the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) acquired jurisdiction over the breakdown of de facto relationships, including same sex de facto relationships.

In Australia, marriage is regulated by the Marriage Act 1961 (Cth) which sets out the requirements for a valid marriage and provides for the recognition of foreign marriages. The Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) regulates the ending of marriages by divorce or decrees of nullity and consequent arrangements for children, financial support and property of the marriage.

Formalities for a valid marriage

The formalities of a valid marriage are:

  • that a marriage must be solemnised by an authorised celebrant;
  • that there must be at least one month’s written notice of the intention to marry;
  • there must be at least two witnesses over the age of 18 years to the ceremony;
  • each party must express their verbal agreement to the union; and
  • the authorised celebrant shall prepare a certificate of marriage which shall be registered with the appropriate registration authority in each State or Territory.

A marriage may be declared to be invalid if these requirements are not met.

Where a same sex marriage was solemnised before the commencement of the amending legislation (a pre-commencement same-sex marriage) which previously would not have been recognised, it may now be recognised as being valid following the commencement of the amending legislation to the Marriage Act 1961 (Cth).

Where a marriage is recognised as a valid marriage by the law or custom of the overseas country it will be recognised as a valid marriage in Australia. Certified evidence of a certificate or registration in that overseas country will be accepted in this country.

For the purpose of proceedings under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), a polygamous marriage which is or has been, a union entered into in a place outside Australia, is deemed to be a marriage.

Void marriages

Section 23B of the Marriage Act 1961 (Cth) sets out the grounds upon which a marriage may be declared void and therefore may be annulled under s 51, FLA. The court may not make a divorce order where it has an application for nullity before it.

The significance of separation

The concept of separation is enormously important in family law matters. The court's jurisdiction to make orders in respect of children, or by way of adjustment of property rights, is normally triggered when the parties separate, not when a divorce order is made or becomes final.

In respect to both de facto relationships and marriage, clarity as to the separation date is essential namely:

In other cases, the date of separation can be an important consideration for the court in determining the appropriate approach to be taken. Those cases include:

  • applications for property settlement involving assets acquired after separation;
  • applications for property settlement in terms of the assessment of contributions post-separation; and
  • care arrangements for children after separation.

In all cases, the separation date is important for the parties as it marks the psychological end to the marriage or relationship and is almost always a time of significant stress and anxiety. In families where there is or has been family violence, separation marks a time when the affected family member (statistically speaking predominantly the female spouse) is at a significantly increased risk of violence from the perpetrator spouse. Where possible, practitioners should ensure that clients are appropriately advised about safe ways (physically and emotionally) to communicate a wish to separate to their spouse.

What does separation mean?

Separation essentially means the breakdown of the marital or de facto relationship to the extent that one or both of the parties intends to permanently sever that relationship. Physical separation alone is neither sufficient nor necessary to establish separation, and the court will have regard several factors in determining when, or if, separation has, in fact, occurred. These include: whether there was a conscious intention and action to separate, and whether that intention was either directly or indirectly communicated to the other party.

Frequently parties will have separated but continue to live in the same house and may share some household services because they may wish to reduce the impact on their children or because they are unable to afford to live in alternate accommodation. In such cases, the parties will need to provide additional supporting affidavits to the court to verify that an actual separation has occurred before a divorce may be granted. See Separation under one roof.

See The meaning of separation.

Resumption of cohabitation

Insubstantial periods of cohabitation are treated as being periods of less than three months and the court may find they have not reduced the period of separation. Generally however, the court will aggregate the periods of living separately and apart in order to determine that the 12 month requirement is met before making a divorce order.

Guidance

De facto law — state based

Show All Guidance

Checklists

  • Children — Checklist for Drafting final parenting orders

    I. Serisier, Australian Encyclopaedia of Forms and Precedents
  • Checklist for Drafting a financial agreement for married parties, or parties contemplating marriage

    LexisNexis Legal Writer team
  • Checklist for Drafting a financial agreement for parties entering, living in or ending a de facto relationship

    LexisNexis Legal Writer team
  • Checklist for Drafting an affidavit

    LexisNexis Legal Writer team
  • Drafting property orders

    LexisNexis Legal Writer team
  • Drafting a child support agreement

    LexisNexis Legal Writer team
  • Financial agreements — Binding financial agreements

    J. Dowd, Watts McCray Lawyers

Legislation

  • Overview

  • De facto relationships under the Family Law Act 1975

  • Cohabitation

  • Defacto law — state based

  • Relationship Register

  • Overview

  • Valid marriages

  • Overseas marriage

  • Overview

  • What does separation mean?

  • Separation under one roof

Forms & Precedents

Relationship Register

Separation under one roof

Latest Legal Updates

19 May 2020

Courts issue arbitration information notice

14 May 2020

Closed contact centre insufficient basis to expedite appeal

04 May 2020

Appeal against returning children to habitual residence

29 Apr 2020

Practice Direction for urgent applications issued

27 Apr 2020

Urgent parenting cases list established

27 Apr 2020

Court issues guide to virtual hearings

22 Apr 2020

Temporary debt relief measures announced

20 Apr 2020

Arbitration List formalises alternative dispute resolution

16 Apr 2020

Family Court of Australia has released a special measure in response to COVID-19

16 Apr 2020

Family Court of Australia and Federal Circuit Court of Australia’s notice to the Profession

15 Apr 2020

PPP500 Case Practice Direction

06 Apr 2020

Parenting orders and COVID-19

01 Apr 2020

New Joint Practice Direction issued

31 Mar 2020

Chief Justice urges parents to cooperate during difficult time

25 Mar 2020

Family courts issue new Practice Directions

23 Mar 2020

Family Court of Australia and the Federal Circuit Court of Australia measures and listing arrangements due to COVID-19

18 Mar 2020

Urgent cases given priority as COVID-19 impact escalates

17 Mar 2020

Precautionary closure of Sydney registry of the Family Court and Federal Circuit Court on 17 March 2020 due to COVID-19

10 Mar 2020

Impact of coronavirus (COVID-19) on Summer Campaign call-overs

10 Mar 2020

Historic step expands role of NSW Children’s Guardian

20 Feb 2020

Family courts launch Summer Campaign

13 Feb 2020

Public invited to comment on intercountry adoptions

07 Feb 2020

Urgent funding injection needed for family courts, says Law Council

30 Jan 2020

Family law core principles Joint Practice Direction issued

27 Jan 2020

Men as role models initiative funded

17 Jan 2020

Nature of trust assets considered — Bernard and Bernard [2019] FamCA 421

13 Jan 2020

Free legal aid for bushfire affected residents

11 Dec 2019

Family courts reform delayed again

02 Jan 2020

Serious injustice considered in light of “substantial contributions” made

28 Nov 2019

Registry opening hours for holiday period

27 Nov 2019

Call for early intervention in Victorian child protection system

14 Nov 2019

Open Letter challenges reform plans

07 Nov 2019

Confidentiality of counselling records tested

21 Oct 2019

Secret de facto relationship considered in intestacy case

11 Oct 2019

Victoria opens first Specialist Family Violence Court

08 Oct 2019

Parenting arrangements after separation report released

25 Sep 2019

Parliamentary family law inquiry announced

16 Sep 2019

Personal cross-examination no longer permitted

16 Sep 2019

Family feud thwarts grandmother’s application

05 Sep 2019

Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Amendment Act 2019 (Victoria)

16 Aug 2019

Fourth Action Plan National Plan to Reduce Violence against Women and their Children 2010-2022

07 Aug 2019

Family law forms updated: The Initiating Application (Family Court and Federal Circuit Court) and the Response to Initiating Application (Family Court only)

02 Aug 2019

Changes to Victorian FVIOs

02 Aug 2019

Judicial bias and “Ebner” principles discussed

02 Aug 2019

Blood ties remain stronger than marriage

02 Aug 2019

“Paramount consideration” reconsidered

30 Jul 2019

Call for submissions on costs

18 Jul 2019

Meaning of “Aboriginal” considered

18 Jul 2019

No access to court correspondence allowed

02 Jul 2019

Young people leaving care continue to struggle

19 Jun 2019

Sperm donor held to be child’s father — Masson v Parsons [2019] HCA 21

17 Jun 2019

Court fees increased from 1 July 2019

13 Jun 2019

BFA and later bankruptcy re-examined

23 May 2019

“Fur baby” not quite part of the family

23 May 2019

Humanity begins at home

09 May 2019

Family court releases revised Family Violence Plan

09 May 2019

ALRC recommends abolition of federal family courts

09 May 2019

Registered private arbitral awards exempted from stamp duty

10 Apr 2019

Family court establishes Joint Rules Harmonisation Working Group

02 Apr 2019

New Family Court and Federal Circuit Court appointments

26 Mar 2019

State based family violence orders — New national website to support victims of domestic and family violence

13 Mar 2019

Family Law Amendment (Family Violence Measures) Regulations 2019 (Cth)

27 Feb 2019

Senate committee recommends merger of Federal Circuit and Family Courts

20 Feb 2019

State based family violence orders — Senate report recommends dowry abuse be included as family violence

20 Feb 2019

Consent orders forms updated

14 Feb 2019

General principles — BVG17 v BVH17 [2019] FCAFC 17

07 Feb 2019

Productivity Commission Report on Government Services 2018 released

25 Jan 2019

Compliance with new family law forms required

25 Jan 2019

New Chief Justice and Deputy Chief Justice sworn in

25 Jan 2019

eFiling enhancements to Commonwealth Courts Portal

17 Jan 2019

Fair Work Amendment (Family and Domestic Violence Leave) Act 2018

11 Jan 2019

Pre-action procedures — FCC introduces judicial mediation

12 Dec 2018

Bill guaranteeing leave for family violence victims introduced

12 Dec 2018

Direct cross-examination of victims now prohibited

05 Dec 2018

Adoption Act 2000 (NSW) amended

05 Dec 2018

Default period of ADVOs extended

26 Nov 2018

Civil Law and Justice Legislation Amendment Act 2018 (Cth)

06 Nov 2018

Appeals — Electronic filing — not very different from filing in the registry

24 Oct 2018

ALRC calls for response to latest discussion paper

10 Oct 2018

Senate forces committee to extend submissions into proposed Family Court merger

10 Oct 2018

New Family Court Chief Justice and Deputy Chief Justice appointed

26 Sep 2018

What is the extent of a police officer’s duty of care to a protected person?

11 Jul 2018

Child support — Faber v Child Support Registrar [2018] FCCA 2301; BC201807530

11 Jul 2018

Increase to family law court fees — 1 July 2018

11 Jul 2018

Assignments to the Appeal Division of the Family Court of Australia

19 Jun 2018

Family Law (Superannuation) (Interest Rate for Adjustment Period) Determination 2018

19 Jun 2018

Family Law Amendment (2018 Measures No. 1) Rules 2018: Extension of grace period

31 May 2018

Court reforms to help families save time and costs in family law disputes

02 Apr 2018

Court orders are going digital

19 Feb 2018

Family Law Rules Amendment (2018 Measures No 1) Rules 2018 (Cth)

15 Dec 2017

No. 2 of 2017 Interim Family Law Proceedings (from 1 January 2018)

13 Dec 2017

National Domestic Violence Order Scheme

08 Dec 2017

Relationships — Marriage equality for Australia

17 Nov 2017

Financial agreements — Thorne v Kennedy [2017] HCA 49; BC201709420

29 Sep 2017

First comprehensive review of the family law act

10 May 2017

Attorney-General for Australia — Transforming the family law system

03 May 2017

Family Law — Yavuz & Yavuz and Anor [2017] FamCAFC 74

30 Jan 2017

Family Law — Morrall & Olmos [2017] FamCAFC 2; BC201750002